Were the bend oriented the other way (in a north-south direction
rather than an east-west orientation) with the existing right-lateral
plate motion, as shown at upper right, this bend would
become a divergent bend, and a basin
would form around the fault, as in the example above.
If we took the hypothetical new bend and reversed the plate motion
so that things moved left-laterally, this
bend would become a convergent bend (bottom right).
The situation would then resemble what is currently
going on in southern California -- compressional forces
causing the uplift of mountains.
Any smaller bend works in the same way, but of course, on a scale to match
that of the bend and the fault involved. Convergent bends will
always cause compression, as divergent bends will always result in
extension. Fault bends can be referred to as "left bends" or "right
bends" depending on their configuration. The Big Bend of the San Andreas
is a "left bend" -- if you were to walk along the fault, starting on a
"straight" section, you would have to veer left when you came to the
bend, regardless of the direction of your approach. The hypothetical
bend shown in the figures above is a "right bend". By comparing the
slip of a fault to a bend along its length, you can quickly tell if it
is a convergent or divergent bend. If the sense of strike-slip and
the bend have the opposite "handedness" -- that is, left-lateral strike-slip
with a right bend, or right-lateral strike-slip with a left bend -- the
bend will be convergent. If the handedness is the same, the bend will
be divergent.